All evidence

Wastewater Watch

This benchmark uses a municipal wastewater simulator, so it is a demonstration of method and not oil and gas field work. It asks whether existing measurements can give useful warning of an effluent excursion.

Simulated data. No real plant results. Open the interactive report

What we found

The black hybrid beat persistence on six-hour rain forecasts, at 1.06 against 1.41 mg N/L. On six-hour storm cases the two were nearly tied.

The grey model struggled under changed conditions and over longer horizons. Simply assuming nothing changes, known as persistence, remained hard to beat.

Simulated data
Six-hour NH4 forecast error (RMSE, mg N/L). Lower is better. 4 test scenarios per weather regime.
MethodRainStorm
Black hybrid1.061.51
Persistence1.411.52
Direct ML1.512.51
Local trend1.891.97
White hybrid2.944.30
Grey hybrid3.084.58
Fixed physics3.334.52

How it was tested

Seven methods ran on 28 custom scenarios of the open-loop BSM1 simulator, with six-hour and 24-hour forecasts. The forecasts used no future control data.

What it doesn’t show

Four test scenarios per regime can’t support broad conclusions. The scenarios come from one simulator set-up, and the 4 mg N/L alert level is illustrative, not a regulatory limit.

It claims no real-plant savings, compliance performance or automatic treatment control.

Could your data give useful warning?

Start with an audit